BEIJING — China’s leading dissident, Liu Xiaobo, was sentenced to 11 years in prison on Friday after a court found the 53-year-old literary scholar guilty of “inciting subversion to state power” through his writings and role in Charter 08, a petition advocating human rights, free speech and an end to one-party rule.

The sentencing sent a signal that the Chinese Communist Party will continue to stifle domestic political critics, especially those who seek to organize their fellow Chinese. And it provided evidence that political modernization might not go hand in hand with China’s economic modernization, contrary to past predictions by Chinese dissidents, U.S. business executives, political theorists and proselytizers of the Internet age.

According to the Dui Hua Foundation, a San Francisco-based human rights group, Liu’s sentence was longer than any other sentence handed down for “inciting subversion” since the charge was established in the 1997 reform of the criminal law.

“You can think democracy, you can talk democracy, but you can’t do democracy,” said Li Fan, director of the World and China Institute in Beijing.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/24/AR2009122401564.html?wpisr⊂=AR

“My neck is swelling up like a blow fish and I am having trouble talking. I have been feeling very ill for the last two weeks.
Congressman, I don’t want them to kill me in here. As you well know, I am being punished for exposing government fraud. However, millions of people don’t file tax returns and I was just used as an example by the DOJ for their new program called the Tax Defiers Initiative.

I have a wonderful husband and two beautiful children. I have already spent 21 months in prison for a non crime, and I refuse to come out dead or maimed for life. I have not caused these people any problems. This is no threat but just for your information.
I also wrote the warden today. Things can’t go on this way as I languish in here for someone’s political gain. God doesn’t like ugly and He is the ultimate judge and vindicator.”

Sherry Peel Jackson 59085-019
FCI COLEMAN MEDIUM
FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
P.O. BOX 1032
COLEMAN, FL 33521

——————
Sherry Peel Jackson is an ex-IRS agent who left when she discovered that there is not law requiring American citizens to pay income tax. Since than she has gone public on this issue and has been fighting two of America’s greatest crime syndicates, the IRS and the Federal Reserve. Sherry Jackson is a true American hero.

On February 14th 2008 she was sentenced to four years in prison for refusing to pay her income tax.

——————

>From Catherine Bleish’s blog:

The feds seem intent upon MURDERING SHERRY JACKSON.
See her own report below, and you’ll understand.
She details how the feds denied her medical care in prison and right now she IS IN THE PROCESS OF DYING.

Sherry was one of the stars of Aaron Russo’s America: Freedom to Fascism.
She was the former IRS agent who cried out, “SHOW ME THE LAW!”.

Right now she deserves the support of the entire Freedom Movement.
We can give it to her by calling her Congressional Representative imploring him to intercede to save her life. For her service to the Cause of Liberty, WE SHOULD DO NO LESS!!

Sherry’s Representative is Hank Johnson, representing the 4th Congressional District of Georgia.

FIRST:

Call and fax him at each office and demand immediate medical attention for Sherry.

[Contact details here:]

http://donttreadoncat.com/2009/12/america-freedom-to-fascism-star-sherry-jackson-is-being-murdered/

Kilde: http://www.dailypaul.com/node/117528

1. Break in at his apartment. Missing papers/documents.
2. Harassment.
3. Low frequency DEW (Direct Energy Weapons), leading to heart failure for him and hospitalized him.

Globaliseringskritikere truer rikets sikkerhet

Present leader of the PST, Jørn Holme, while he was working in the Justice Department, in a newspaper article in 2003, said that critics of the globalization treathen the national security.

Ertresvåg is claiming the Norwegian Government is doing nothing to protect dissidents from such criminal behaviour by hidden forces.

Ertresvåg is the author of the books ‘Makten bak Makten’ and ‘Sov mitt lille Norge‘. He is one of the most famous critics of the globalists movement in Norway. He have a lifelong service as journalist, and have also held the position as Editor In Chief for Inter Press Service IPS.

Article (in Norwegian) : http://www.nyhetsspeilet.no/2009/08/per-aslak-ertresvag-anmelder-pst-og-myndighetene/

The 7.september 2007 he announced a 9/11 Truth Group in Norway at a meeting/pressconference together with David Ray Griffin, Berit Ås og Trude Malthe Thommasen in Kristiansand, Norway.
http://www.riksavisen.no/?p=372

See his press conference below:

Norske politiske dissidenter blir utsatt for psykologisk terror, biologisk krigsføring og elektromagnetisk stråling.
Part 1:

Part 2:

“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.” —Thomas Jefferson

In November 1949, Eustace Mullins, 25, was a researcher in Washington DC when friends invited him to visit the famous American poet Ezra Pound, who was confined at St. Elizabeth’s Mental Hospital and listed as a “political prisoner.”

A leading figure in Modern English literature, Pound was the editor and critic who introduced the world to James Joyce, W.B. Yeats and T.S. Eliot. During the Second World War, he was charged with treason for broadcasts on Rome Radio that questioned the motives behind America’s involvement.

Pound commissioned Mullins to examine the influence of the banking establishment on U.S. policy.

———–
The legendary historian Eustace Mullins dies, sadly, just one month before 87th birthday! He was admired world-wide & will be greatly missed!

Just after noon Central time, the legendary author of hundreds of books and pamphlets demolishing the lies of war-making mainstream media, historian Eustace Mullins died Tuesday, Feb. 2, 2010, at the home of his caretaker in a small town in Texas.

Mullins, who would have been 87 on March 9th, suffered a stroke three weeks ago in Columbus, Ohio. He had been on an extended tour of his admirers for much of the past year, visiting and chatting with many of his thousands of fans who jumped at the chance to buy his books from him in person.

(Note: Eustace attended a party, held in honour of his 80th birthday, at the infamous Jekyll Island Hotel in Georgia. He accepted a glass of wine – contrary to his lifestyle & better judgement – after which he did not feel well. He said that when he got into his car to leave the hotel, he had 5 accidents before he even got out of the parking lot! When he got on the highway to head home he ended up on the wrong side of the highway and was pulled over by the police and resent on his way. He said this happened no less than 13 times?!?!? Now unless they wanted you to have a head-on collision, do you think the police would let you go 13 times?!? Eustace said his health went down hill ever since & has suffered several strokes since that fatefull night.)

The author of such incendiary books as “Secrets of the Federal Reserve,” “Murder by Injection,” and “The Curse of Canaan,” Mullins was harassed by the FBI for almost a half century, and had one of his books burned in Germany in the 1950s. These stories are recounted in one of his books, “A Writ for Martyrs.”

A protege of the imprisoned patriotic poet Ezra Pound, Mullins compiled a well-researched corpus of works that detailed the passage down through time of a hereditary group of banker killers who have essentially ruled the world from behind the scenes since ancient times.
http://johnkaminski.info/pages/articles/legendary_historian_eustace_mullins_dies.htm

Mullins spent every morning for two years in the Library of Congress and met with Pound every afternoon. The resulting manuscript, “The Secrets of the Federal Reserve” proved too hot for any American publisher to handle. Nineteen rejected it. One said, “you’ll never get this published in New York.” When it finally appeared in Germany in 1955, the U.S. Military Government confiscated all 10,000 copies and burned them.

Thanks to the American Patriot Friends Network, this book is freely available on line. (I recommend you save it on your desktop, as I did.) Why is it so (excuse the pun) inflammatory?

Essentially it paints a picture of the world, and the role of the United States, which is radically different from the one we are given in school or in the media.

“Notwithstanding the war of independence against England,” writes Mullins, “we remained an economic and financial colony of Great Britain.” Between 1865 and 1913, he says London bankers led by the Rothschilds used agents such as J.P. Morgan and J.D. Rockefeller to gain control of American industry and organize it into cartels.

Where did these bankers get the money? For over 200 years, European bankers have been able to draw on the credit of their host countries to print it!

In the Seventeenth Century, the moneylenders and the aristocracy made a pact. If the king would make paper currency a liability of the state, the moneylenders would print as much as he liked! Thus the Banks of England, France and the Reichsbank came into being but they were all private corporations and remain so today.

According to this nefarious pact, the moneylenders got to charge interest on assets they created out of thin air. The aristocracy all took shares in the central banks plus they got to finance a burgeoning government and to wage costly wars.

This piece of chicanery is at the heart what plagues humanity.

The bankers have a vested interest in the state (i.e. the people) incurring as much debt as possible. They are behind the Marxist, socialist and liberal movements which call for big government and social spending. They are behind the catastrophic wars of the last century. The Warburgs financed the Bolshevik Revolution. The Bank of England financed the rise of Hitler. Prescott Bush (W’s grandfather) was head of Brown Brothers Harriman, which financed the construction of the Nazi war machine.

Naturally if you can create money out of thin air, your first instinct is to buy tangible assets with it. There is a powerful impulse to use debt to control nations and take over their real assets. This is the essence of the so-called Third World Debt crisis. Dedicated to owning all wealth and enslaving humanity, an irresistible vampire has been unleashed uponthe world

Much of Mullins book is devoted to the subterfuge by which the United States was drawn into its lethal embrace. In 1913, the Owen-Glass Bill gave mostly foreign-controlled banks (posing as “the Federal Reserve”) the right to create currency based on the credit of the United States government and to charge it interest for doing it!

To accomplish this, the bankers had to rig the election of 1913 in order to get Woodrow Wilson elected. Then their stooges in Congress passed the legislation on December 22 after their opponents had gone home for Christmas.

“This act establishes the most gigantic trust [cartel] on earth,” Congressman Charles Lindbergh said at the time. “When the President signs this bill; the invisible government by the Monetary Power will be legalized. The people may not know it immediately but the day of reckoning is only a few years removed.”

Mullins explains that the legislation passed just in time for the American people to finance World War One. After maintaining standing armies for 50 years, European powers no longer could afford the luxury of another war. But the U.S. was relatively debt free and made the whole thing possible.

What would WWI have been without Germany? Apparently Germany was not self-sufficient in food and would have had to sit out this war. In the nick of time, the bankers organized something called “The Belgium Relief Committee” which channeled billions of dollars worth of U.S. meat and potatoes not to Belgium but to Germany. When Edith Cavell, an American working in a Belgium hospital pointed this out, British intelligence had the Germans arrest and execute her.

Mullins makes a convincing case that every U.S. President since Wilson has been a lackey of the bankers. J.F. Kennedy was assassinated because he started to print his own U.S. government-backed currency. This is also the transgression that led to the murders of Presidents Abraham Lincoln and James Garfield.

Last year alone, the American people paid $360 billion in interest to the bankers. To maintain this massive fraud, the bankers enforce an iron grip on the political and cultural organs of the nation. According to Mullins, “The New York Times” is owned by the Kuhn Loeb while “The Washington Post” is owned by Lazard Freres. In Europe the Rothschilds own Reuters as well as the French and German news services.

I presume US publishers, TV networks and movie producers are similarly beholden. Rockefellers, Carnegies and the Fords endow the nations’ libraries and universities. Journalists and professors dutifully parrot fantasies about democracy and freedom. Mind control laboratories run by the CIA and the British army (TheTavistock Institute) dream up ways to manipulate and undermine the population. The psychological sterilization of the human female (”feminism”) is an example.

The “War on Terror” is part of the banking cabal’s plan to consolidate its grip on humanity in a friendly (or not so friendly) fascist “New World Order.” They want to secure their political, economic and social grip on the obstreperous Muslim world, as well as build up a security apparatus in case the docile populations of the West become restive.

Well, at least the cosmic battle between Good and Evil is out in the open at last!

http://www.savethemales.ca/260602.html

Mullins own words:

“In my own case, I was kept under personal surveillance by the FBI for thirty-three years, without ever being charged with any offense.  Although I was fired from well-paying jobs because of the orders from FBI officials to my employers, orders which carried the personal imprimatur of the Freemason, J. Edgar Hoover, who was head of the FBI, I continued with my patriotic work.  This caused the terrorists to turn their attention to my family, who had not the slightest idea of what was really going on in this country.  In succession, my ailing father, my invalid mother, and my handicapped sister were hounded to their deaths, dying of heart attacks caused by the frenetic and persistent campaigns of hate and terror launched against them by the sinister combination of the ADL-FBI-Mossad apparat from Washington.  As was the case with most victims of these terrorists, no arrests were ever made.  Their names were added to the list of one billion victims of these hate-filled, sadistic vampires, whose lives are lived in an ongoing orgy of blood and lust.”

http://www.yamaguchy.netfirms.com/7897401/mullins/victim.html

Jones and I had collaborated in the spring of 2006 on his research into the molten metal seen at the World Trade Center. I had learned and reported about the molten iron found in the basements of the three collapsed towers in the summer of 2002. These reports had piqued the interest of Jones several years later. His scientific interest resulted in a thesis that Thermite-type cutter charges had been used to facilitate the destruction of the twin towers and the 47-story WTC 7.

I took Jones’ research to the University of California at Davis where I met with Professor Thomas Cahill. Cahill had collected data and analyzed the particles of the smoke (with a Davis DRUM) that rose from the WTC debris pile from early October until Christmas 2001. The extraordinary abundance of nano-size particles in the bluish smoke indicated that the molten metal beneath the towers was hotter than the boiling point of iron and the other metals found in the bluish smoke. This is the kind of evidence that those who support the official version hate.

SMEAR-AND-FEAR CAMPAIGN

Were the attacks on me and Professor Jones related? Were we attacked, slandered, and discredited because we were asking too many questions about 9/11?
In her recent article, “War and the Police State: Complicity of the American People,” Donna J. Thorne wrote, “Fearing exposure, the Czars of Propaganda know that ‘Truthers’ must be branded and discredited if government corruption and corporate fraud is to flourish unabated.”

Link to the article in Global Research

“Fear attempts to silence dissenters,” Thorne wrote. “As the Truth Movement gains momentum and amasses credibility, the fear profiteers have begun heralding yet another ‘threat’ to National Security – inquiring minds. This is both good news and bad news. We are no longer ignorable. Fearing exposure, the Czars of Propaganda know that ‘Truthers’ must be branded and discredited if government corruption and corporate fraud is to flourish unabated. This said, prepare for an intensified Smear-and-Fear Campaign. Any group or individual who vocally questions the official story of 9/11 or who exercises the right to demand Government accountability will be labeled ‘Anti-American and Anti-Patriotic.’”

As a nation of free men and women – will we allow this? Will we stand up for the Truth – or will we quietly submit to the lies?

http://www.bollyn.com/hidden-in-menus#article_10742

“The banks have corrupted parliaments and courts in order to achieve their seemingly invincible position. Through the parliaments, banks have set in place legislation which forms the blue print and provides the means to realize their goal.

However, such legislation can only be enforced through the courts where, if justice were to prevail, bad laws would be vetoed and rejected in fair trials or tribunals. That is why the banks have to have dominance over the courts. They do this by firstly controlling the judges and secondly eliminating juries—thereby removing any possibility that the judges may “do right” or that the people may exercise their will.

But there is a chink in the banks’ armour—an Achilles’ heel. There is a way to smash the banks by proclaiming a simple truth which the banks have swept aside in the implementation of their practice of issuing loan contracts.

The truth is in the meaning of the word, “variable,” as found in the Oxford English Dictionary. “Variable” means “uncertain” and “certain” means “not variable.” For contracts to be valid under the common law, there must be “certainty of terms” as an essential element. Therefore, all loan contracts in which the banks have incorporated variable interest rates are invalid. Those loans are illegal and the banks are common law criminals.

The judges know this and are concealing this serious offence. This website RightsandWrong,com.au exposes the incompetence, corruption and treachery in the judiciary.

Magna Carta says, “To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny or delay, Right or Justice.” Unless the banks can be defeated, such noble principles are gone and the people, having no rights, are merely slaves”.

The other day I received the following information by email:

Police came to arrest John on Thursday July 16, the first officer went away after John asked to see a warrant and told him he was trespassing. The police replied, “We don’t need a warrant we are the police.” A couple of hours later they came back in force. As John was videoing the goings on, they started on the screen door with a crowbar, after damaging the screen door and going to start on the main door, John told them to hold off and he will open the door, he put the camera down and opened the door, they proceeded to attack him, they had him on the ground, one had him in a head lock another jumped on his back and had his knees compressing his chest so he could hardly breath, John said that he thought that he was going to die, the policeman on top of him said, “That will teach you.” Photo shows John Wilson’s graffiti on his former dental surgery.

And all this without a warrant and no charge. Are they acting under a new law??? The Mental Health Act?. . . so they put him in Silverwater Jail, the hearing is set down for the August 26, and to keep him out of circulation they are going to hear it with a camera link-up with Silverwater Jail, they won’t let him have any paperwork to defend himself in court. How is that for a totalitarian police State!!! John has applied for bail, but he thinks that since they want him out of harm’s way the chances of getting bail are slim, beside the fact that the Police are acting like terrorists, breaking every law that you can think of, trespass, break and enter, assault, robbery, (they stole his camera with all the evidence).

Since John will be out of action until at least the August 26 for any updates email John Bauskis. John has asked me to try and organize a peaceful protest at Parramatta Local Court on August 26, all carrying the Australian flag, and wearing tee shirts with “Trial by Jury is Democracy” or appropriate slogan, now this is our last chance to fight for our Rights.
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/

Full story: rightsandwrong.com.au newswithviews.com

Marius Reikerås representerer Nordsjødykkerne som sitter på mulige erstatningskrav mot Staten på flere hundre millioner kroner. Statens eiere, det skjulte klandestine nettverk som har hatt makten (og æren – som egentlig de stjal fra krigseilerne også i tillegg til hyrene deres) etter krigen i vårt land, ønsker ikke at Nordsjødykkerne skal få disse penger, – som de regner for sine, siden de skal investeres i DERES saker, og ikke spres ut til de menige nordmenn i utrengsmål.

I 2008 hadde Marius med suksess fått saken med Nordsjødykkerne til førsteinstans; Oslo Tingrett. Systemet synes ikke om å få den lenger opp i rettssystemet.

De 19 nordsjødykkerne i Nordsjødykker Alliansen (NSDA) tapte saken mot den norske stat i dom avsagt 9. september 2008. Ikke ble det dømt for menneskerettighetsbrudd. Ikke ble det gitt erstatning. Saken ble for vanskelig for Oslo Tingrett som mente at Høyesterett måtte avgjøre om Staten kunne gjøres objektiv ansvarlig.

Advokat Marius Reikerås jobber mot alle odds i denne saken, idet Staten underslår dokumenter, så det blir en nesten umulig oppgave. Med hans egne ord: ‘Jeg begynte å jobbe med dykkersaken i juni 2006 og siden har denne tatt mesteparten av min tid. For meg har det vært et enormt privilegium å få være med dykkerne å få jobbe med dykkersaken.

Som menneskerettsadvokat er det ingen saker som er viktigere enn denne. Det gjelder på alle plan. Når jeg er ferdig med dykkersaken, kan det godt være at jeg ikke lengre har noen motivasjon for å jobbe som advokat.

Jeg har snakket med Tom og Guttorm nærmest daglig siden 2006 og for meg fremstår disse som to helt enestående personer som aldri kommer til å gi opp før anstendigheten har seiret. Det gjør forresten mange andre involverte i dykkersaken også. Når en har slike personer som går foran, så gir det signaler til resten om at dette skal vi lykkes med.

De har, tross helt minimalt med ressurser og med maksimalt av trakassering og hindringer, ført en kamp som gjør at jeg vil si at vi aldri har vært nærmere et gjennombrudd i dykkersaken enn hva vi er i dag. ‘

Den 3. januar skrev Dagbladets utmerkede og idealistiske journalist, Gunnar Ringheim en leder på side 3 om ‘ Den norske skammen’. Her skriver ham blant annet: ‘Politikerne står i ei dyp tillitskrise overfor pionerdykkerne, som opplever at Stortinget sendte regjeringsadvokaten på dem i retten med ubegrensede midler og vide fullmakter til å obstruere og trakassere. Selv måtte dykkerne låne penger til fly og tog for å følge sin egen rettssak. De sov på flatseng under den 13 uker lange maratonrettssaken fordi uføretrygden ikke rakk til hotellovernatting. Og fordi rettsprinsippene ikke rakk til husly for langveisfarende saksøkere med traumatiske helseskader.‘

‘Dette setter ting i perspektiv og forteller oss om en rettsstat som ikke yter rettferdighet for de som ikke er bemidlet eller har ressurser, sier Reikerås.

Like etter at Nordsjødykkersaken var over i september 2008. satte nettverket igang sitt apparat:

• Fraværsdom av det statlige forliksråd hvor Reikerås er gjort fullstendig rettsløs og ikke minst fullstendig uvitende med et totalkrav på rundt 1,4 millioner kroner. Det konstateres siden at Forliksrådet i Bergen som domsorgan, gjennom betydelig påvirkning av advokat Wesenberg, har begått noe av det groveste overtrampet mot en enkeltperson som noen gang er gjort. Det fantastiske er at tilsvar var selvsagt inngitt, og saken ble av partene hevet, men til tross for dette avsier Forliksrådet uteblivelsesdom (?). Det er nettopp fordi Marius tidligere har opplevd særdeles mangelfull behandling i Forliksrådet at han selvsagt sørget for å få kopi av kvittering for at tilsvar var gitt innen den 18.3.08, samme dato hvor saken også ble hevet. At Egil Anfindsen trakk denne saken, er også bekreftet mottatt av Namsfogden hvor det viser seg at også denne tilbaketrekkingen er mottatt den 10. juni 2008 :

1. Det vises om dette til tilleggsanmeldelse av 18.6.08 fra Wesenberg hvor han skriver på side 2 4, avsnitt:
   ‘Ved fornyet henvendelse til forliksrådet har jeg nå fått bekreftet at forliksrådet mottok erklæring fra Egil Anfindsen den 10. juni d.å.‘
2. Det utrolige, er altså at advokat Wesenberg sitter med bekreftelsen på at Egil Anfindsen trakk forliksklagen tilbake også i juni måned og som vitterlig er mottatt av Namsfogden i Bergen. Videre er det altå slik at Wesenberg selv bekrefter at forliksrådet mottok tilbaketrekkingserklæringen av 10. juni og at han har hatt kontakt med Forliksrådet etter denne datoen..
3. Når dette sees i sammenheng med at Wesenberg selv anmoder om at fraværsdom avsies så raskt som mulig, tror kan en knapt tro det en leser.
4. Det er således altså slik at Forliksrådet har vært fullt ut klar over at klagen var trukket tilbake og dette er bekreftet mottatt hos Namsfogden den 10.06.08. Så viser det seg altså at Wesenberg har hatt en eller flere samtaler med en eller annen ansatt hos Forliksrådet og anmodet om at det avises uteblivelsesdom til tross for at saken er hevet. Det er jo helt på det rene at Forliksrådet også avsier slik avgjørelse rett i etterkant, og fullstendig bak domfeltes rygg. Hvordan dette kan være mulig, er ikke til å fatte. At dette skjer i Norge er ikke til å tro og det må sies å være svært alvorlig.
5. Som ikke dette er nok, sender så Wesenberg et brev til Marius primo oktober hvor han truer med å begjære utlegg i hans families eiendeler med hjemmel i den avsagte uteblivelsesavgjørelsen. En kan jo bare forestille seg hvordan familien reagerer når noen kommer hjem og forteller at Wesenberg har truet med utleggsbegjæring i våre felles eiendeler med støtte i en uteblivelsesavgjørelse der det er helt tydelig at alt har skjedd bak hans rygg og hvor Wesenberg selv har hatt samtaler og påvirket representanter for Forliksrådet til å avsi denne uteblivelsesavgjørelsen på tross av at Forliksrådet vet saken er hevet og trukket ikke bare en, men to ganger.
6. Så fortsetter den utrolige historien hvor han den 9.12.08 mottar brev fra brev fra den SAMME Namsfogden i Bergen hvor iverksettelsene av truslene til Wesenberg nå er blitt en realitet ved at det skal avholdes utleggsforretning hos Namsfogden den 5.1.09.

• Advarsel fra Advokatbevillingsnemden (statlige Tilsynsrådet) fordi han ikke hadde mulighet til å ferdigstille regnskapet så lenge dykkersaken pågikk (var bare snakk om en måneds tid utsettelse). Det hele begynte med at han skrev et brev til Tilsynsrådet den 18. mars, hvor det gjordes klart at det ville være umulig å få regnskapet klart innen 1.april på grunn av alt arbeide med dykkersaken. En stund etter dette, fikk han det første av to svært fiendtlige brev fra Tilsynsrådet. Formen opplevdes som svært truende og i det første brevet, fikk han klar beskjed om at siden regnskapet var forsinket, så ville tilsynsrådet oversende saken til advokatbevillingsnemnden med anbefaling om å frata han bevillingen. Det ble så skrevet tilbake og sa at han for lenge siden hadde gjort Tilsynsrådet oppmerksom på at det var umulig å ferdigstille regnskapet til 1.4.08 og at både hans kollega og han selv var fysisk og psykisk utslitt som følge av et enormt arbeidspress det seneste året. Samtidig ga han også beskjed om at regnskapet ligger hos revisor og var klart innen utgangen av juni som er fristen etter regnskapsloven. Den 27.6. ble regnskapet innsendt og revisorgodkjent uten anmerkninger.

• Fullt bokettersyn fra det statlige tilsynsråd uten informasjon om noe som helst av rettigheter. Må avlegge rapport for når han avvikler sommerferien. Tilsynsrådets egen revisor, Svein Erik Stiansen, ringer og sier at han vil komme dagen etter for å avholde bokettersyn. Altså en dags varsel, uten at Marius Reikerås skal få tid til å sette seg inn i hvilke rettigheter han har i forbindelse med blant annet det faktum at et advokatkontor håndterer taushetsbelagt og sensitiv informasjon. Tonen fra revisor opplevdes som til dels svært amper. Marius Reikerås svarer at det ikke lar seg gjøre å avholde et tilsyn med bare timers varsel.
  Samme dag sender så revisor Stiansen en e-post til Marius med følgende ordlyd:
  ‘For ordens skyld ber jeg deg vennligst sende meg en skriftlig beskjed om at du starter ferien i morgen onsdag 25. juni.‘.
  ‘Jeg må altså rapportere til Tilsynsrådet og revisor Stiansen om når jeg skal starte min ferie. Det hele virker helt surrealistisk.‘, sier Mrius Reikerås.
  ‘Fra torsdag den 25.9.08 begynner en nærmest vanvittig trakasseringsprosess fra Stiansen, hvor Stiansen direkte trakasserer med å sende en rekke e-poster i helgene‘.03.10.08 Kl 17.49
  10.10.08 kl 18.25
  04.11.08 kl 06.04 (bare noen timer før Reikerås skal stå i høyesterett og føre sin prøvesak)

• Flere politianmeldelser fra Wesenberg på vegne av en ‘klient’, som påstod at han hadde overtatt en av Reikerås’ klienter, men som ikke var tilfelle. I desember 2008, fikk så Reikerås den siste utleggsbegjæring fra namsfogden og totalt sett har så advokat Wesenberg med hjemmel i denne uteblivelsesavgjørelsen, som han fritt har fått diktere, forlangt utlegg på ca 1,5 millioner i Reikerås families eiendeler og hvor det så tidlig som 22.desember 2008 skal avholdes den første av tre utleggsforretninger. Det er således overveldende bevis for at Wesenberg forsøker og også påvirke namsfogden til å ta utlegg i advokat Reikerås families eiendeler på tross av at han ikke bare har vært i ond tro, han har også diktert hele uteblivelsesavgjørelsen. Dette er et grovt forsøk på bedrageri, i tillegg til det straffbare som ligger i å påvirke et offentlig organ. Følgende kan oppsummeres slik:

1. Det er betydelige bevis og hevet over enhver tvil at Wesenberg har påvirket forliksrådet til å avsi en uteblivelsesdom mot meg på nærmere 1,5 millioner kroner.
2. - Alt er gjort bak hans rygg og kunnskap, og på kontradiksjonsmuligheter eksisterer ikke.

• Strøk på prøvesak for Høyesterett, selv om saken ble vunnet. I ettertid fant en ut at den ene dommeren, Kirsti Coward, er samboer med regjeringsadvokaten, Svein Fagernes. Fagernes er altså sjefen til Reusch og Sending som er prosessfullmektiger i ‘dykkersaken’.

• Blitt ilagt renter på nærmere 50.000 kroner og et totalt restskatt på nærmere 800.000 som skatt i relasjon til arbeidet med dykkersaken til tross for at han ikke har mottatt lønn for dykkersaken ennå.

• I tillegg blir han ‘bombandert’ med statlige trusler om inkasso.

• I tillegg kommer statlige momskrav med mer for samme ikke forfalte fremtidige inntekter.

Full pakke av hva Herman Berge kalle PSYOP nervekrig operasjoner. Som altså går på å psyke en ut, angrep fra alle kanter samtidig. Dette er spesielt vanskelig å oppleve for de som ikke forstår eller vet hva de står ovenfor og hvorfor. Vet en DET, så går alt så mye bedre. I ettertid har det også vist seg at advokat Wesenberg og Tilsynsrådet har hatt mye korrespondanse bak Reikerås sin rygg, da sannsynligvis for å koordinere PSYOP nervekrig operasjonen.

Noe av det verste med dette, er at Marius Reikerås har dokumentasjon på samarbeidet mellom Wesenberg og Tilsynsrådet/ Stiansen, uten at offeret deres får vite noen ting. I det hele tatt så er dette pill råttent, hvis formål utelukkende er å knekke Marius Reikerås med en langvarig psykisk trakassering.

Marius Reikerås sier videre i en email til undertegnede den 5. Januar 2009:
‘Mitt lille firma har som klar målsetting å kjempe for den lille mot den store og det har jeg vel etter hvert fått et navn for. Det å kjempe mot staten vet vi alle i utgangspunktet er en meget krevende jobb, hvor ressursene er svært skjeve. Vi vet også gjennom blant annet dykkersaken, at staten er villig til å ta i bruk alle nødvendige hjelpemidler for å hindre at sannheten kommer frem.

Til tross for alle forsøk fra statlig side på å motarbeide oss, lot vi oss heldigvis ikke kneble og det liker selvsagt ikke staten. Og det er det jeg bokstavlig talt føler på kroppen nå. Jeg opplever at Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet virkelig har satt i gang en omfattende og langvarende trakasseringsprosess for å få psyke meg ned og få meg fjernet. Mitt tips er at de forsøker å frata meg bevillingen i løpet av dette halvår.‘

Reikerås sier videre i en email den 26.01.2009:
‘Dykkersaken har nesten kostet meg helsa, ikke bare på grunn av all jobbingen, men mest fordi jeg er blitt kjeppjaget av Det statlige tilsynsrådet i lang tid nå. Grunnen er selvsagt at de ønsker å psyke meg ned å ta fra meg bevillingen, slik at jeg ikke lengre kan jobbe med dykkersaken. Jeg har med hjelp av andre gått Tilsynsrådet og herrene Bruusgaard og Stiansen i sømmene. Og det er ikke pent det vi har funnet. Gå inn på rettsnorge.no og les om disse to som har trakassert meg på det groveste i godt over ett halv år. Med andre ord begynte trakasseringen rett etter at vi var ferdig med dykkersaken i Oslo tingsrett. Neppe tilfeldig.‘

Han forsetter med godt mot for utsiktene i 2009:
‘Vi kan ikke lengre sitte og se på at mennesker blir behandlet på denne måten av verdens rikeste land. Det gjelder så mange andre også. Det være seg FN- veteranen, krigsbarn, barnehjemsbarn, sjøfolk, vaksineofre m.fl blir behandlet på denne måten av en Ap- regjering som nærmest later som om de ikke finnes. Det er tydelig at intet er lært i forhold til hvordan vi behandlet krigsseilerne. I helgen leste jeg i VG at en døende og nå død kreftpasient fikk avkortet erstatningen sin fra 900 000 til 180 000 fra staten fordi han skulle dø. Når slikt skjer, er det på tide å si stopp.

Kommer jeg meg gjennom denne kneika skal jeg love at jeg vil være mer motivert enn noen gang for å fortsette å jobbe for rettferdigheten.‘
Sitat slutt.

For å komme for nært denne sannhet, om hvem som besitter vårt statsapparat, og hvem som profitter på oss, ble Synnøve tatt ut, og likeledes har Berge og Reikerås kommet litt for mye inn på deres historiske enemerker; nemlig monopolet på å forsyne seg av den fullstappede norske statskasse. Så de må ‘tas ut’. De vil ikke dele nei.

During a 1998 Bush rally and speech at DuPont Photomask Facility, Alex asks the following question.

“Sir, shouldn’t we abolish the Federal Reserve and the CFR? That’s the real reality that none of you will talk about and most of you are members. That’s what’s destroying this country governor. Don’t you stand for America sir? What about the Federal Reserve and the CFR?”‘

Alex is then grabbed by Texas police, taken outside and handcuffed. The cameraman is threatened as he films the entire incident. Afterwards, Alex was kidnapped and driven around for half an hour before being thrown out on the side of the road. All for the crime of asking a question!

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2006/050506askingquestion.htm

Liu Xiaobo was charged on with “alleged agitation activities” aimed at overthrowing the government and the nation’s socialist system, the official Xinhua news agency reported on Wednesday.

He has been in police custody since December 8, the day before the publication of a document that he co-authored, appealing for political reform in China and an end to one-party rule.

“Liu has been engaged in agitation activities, such as the spreading of rumours and defaming of the government, aimed at subversion of the state and overthrowing the socialism system in recent years,” Xinhua News Agency quoted a Beijing police statement as saying.

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia-pacific/2009/06/200962442843135798.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liu_Xiaobo

16 June 2009
RAN 25/09

The Writers in Prison Committee (WiPC) of International PEN is seriously concerned about the detention of Le Cong Dinh, lawyer and dissident writer arrested on 13 June 2009. The authorities have charged him with ‘spreading propaganda against the state’, which carries a twenty year prison term. International PEN fears that Le Cong Dinh may be held for his legitimate reporting, and if so, it calls for his immediate and unconditional release in accordance with Article 19 of the United Nations International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights to which Vietnam is a signatory.

According to PEN’s information, Le Cong Dinh was arrested in Saigon by the security police at 11am on 13 June 2009. His home and his office were searched and his documents seized. According to press reports, the head of the Investigation Agency of the Vietnamese Ministry of Public Security stated that Le Cong Dinh was arrested for allegedly reporting ‘distorted’ facts to foreign media and offending the country’s Prime Minister. Le Cong Dinh has been charged under Article 88 of the Penal Code for ‘spreading propaganda against the state”, and could face up to twenty years of imprisonment if found guilty.

Born in 1 October 1968, Le Cong Dinh has been working as a lawyer defending journalists, human rights activists and internet writers prosecuted in Viet Nam for their reporting, including lawyers and dissident writers Nguyen Van Dai and Le Thi Cong Nhan, and the renowned blogger Dieu Cay, who have been taken up as main cases by International PEN WiPC. Le Cong Dinh has also written for various international media outlets, including the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) and Radio Free Asia (RFA), and banned oveseas Vietnamese websites such as the “Vietnam Democracy Movement”, “Vietnam Reform”, “New Horizon”, “Thorough Discussion”, and “Democratic Freedom”, which Vietnamese authorities view as “subversive”.

According to Reporters Without Borders, sources said that Le Cong Dinh’s arrest might be related to a libel case brought by several lawyers against the Vietnamese Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung.

http://www.internationalpen.org.uk/go/news/vietnam-lawyer-and-dissident-writer-arbitrary-detained